Distinction Between Murder and Execution essays

Distinction Between Murder and Execution essays Distinction between Murder and Execution I understand that there is a distinction between murder and state controlled execution, but I don't think that applies to the morality of both acts of murder and state controlled execution. Both have the same effect, the termination of life without consent. Although voluntary suicide for a prisoner on death row is much different because this is when somebody want their life taken from them, and this is when and individual is making a choice, which I don't believe a murderer should be given. Rather than randomly executing murderers or giving them the choice to die, I believe it would serve society better to try and eliminate the causes instead of reacting to crime itself? Two wrongs don't make a wright, and I believe that if society wants the murder rate to decrease, taking this route will produce more results than the death penalty. I believe Murder is wrong and there should be no exceptions. For example kidnapping and an arrest, some will say what's the difference, well both are taking someone somewhere against their will. I could be wrong but I think that people will say one is Wright and one is wrong. Back to murder and execution, like I said in the first paragraph, wouldn't it be better to try and eliminate the cause (murder) rather than reacting to crime itself? A personal view of mine is that man's nature is essentially bad. I'm not saying every man is bad or every man is good, as we are still part of the animal kingdom. Therefor like in the animal Kingdome I believe man's primitive urge is to survive, it seems like some people with psychological problems find logic in killing another person? I don't know much about the government? But it seems like throughout time laws have been designed as a reaction to mans actions. One of the things I believe about our society is that murder will always be here and the only way to suppress it is to make people think about the ...